<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.158 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Wed, 22 May 2013 08:27:31 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog - Comments</title><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.158 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>Daniel comments on Are We Just Fooling Ourselves With All These Captive Portals?</title><author>Daniel</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:25:33 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/27/are-we-just-fooling-ourselves-with-all-these-captive-portals.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19979300</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I agree that HS2.0 will definitely help solve this. My question is, does HS2.0 help if a device does not have a cellular data plan/capabilities? It will work great for &#39;carrier&#39; capable devices because the devices will already have credentials on them. However, what about a tablet that only has Wi-Fi. How do we get credentials onto that device? Is the Google/Facebook method the solution there? It&#39;s definitely an interesting idea (privacy issues/concerns aside).</p><p>Admittedly, I need to read up more on HS2.0 before I start asking too many questions. </p><p>Daniel</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Danif comments on Are We Just Fooling Ourselves With All These Captive Portals?</title><author>Danif</author><pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:36:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/27/are-we-just-fooling-ourselves-with-all-these-captive-portals.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19979037</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I think Hotspot2  in his final stage will solve this issue. you will probably, at some point, will be able to connect to the network with you google/facebook account as some type of pre shared key.<br/>I totally agree that at this point (you mentioned its already 2013....(-;) this is a big security issue.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Daniel comments on Why Using PEAP/MSCHAPv2 for BYOD is Dumb</title><author>Daniel</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:36:50 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/22/why-using-peapmschapv2-for-byod-is-dumb.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19966635</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, MegaG Badman.</p><p>The general ease you mentioned is the reason why see people using PEAP, I think. Completely agree that it can be easy, and that it can be made to work if you have multiple levels of authentication and authorization. Definitely. </p><p>I&#39;m curious, what kind of experience have you had with Windows 7 auto-configuring itself? I&#39;ve found that it is a bit unpredictable. It&#39;s great when it works but the 20% of the time that it chooses the wrong settings the end-users are left calling helpdesk. Maybe it&#39;s just a few corner cases that I&#39;ve run into?</p><p>Anyway, thanks again for dropping in and sharing your thoughts.</p><p>Daniel</p>]]></description></item><item><title>MegaG Badman comments on Why Using PEAP/MSCHAPv2 for BYOD is Dumb</title><author>MegaG Badman</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/22/why-using-peapmschapv2-for-byod-is-dumb.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19966335</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I agree- to a point. For the right environment, the trade-off of using MS-CHAP v2/PEAP is ease (with onboarding tool or OS X and latest Windows abilities to self-configure) versus the security risks you bring up. But... the users that get on this way don&#39;t have to be given the keys to the castle. You can still enjoy the benefits of easy, well-supported EAP, but use network controls to restrict where users on this net can go, and then use like machine auth + user auth for access to the important stuff. Lots of nuance, and all depends on who the clients are and what the business risks amount to. But your points are well stated and valid.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Troy comments on Free Wi-Fi Really Grinds My Gears</title><author>Troy</author><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 06:03:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/9/free-wi-fi-really-grinds-my-gears.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19920842</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Is this just a question of optics?  I see the appeal of marketing Public/Guest Wi-Fi touted as a Free, Fast and Easy hat trick.  Using one example, if a rooms dynamic cost assignment went from $129 to $139 - coinciding with a Wi-Fi rollout which happened at the same time, could the Wi-Fi still be considered free?  Customers connecting to the hotel SSID, would not be required to pay a fee for Wi-Fi - thereby making it appear as though connecting to the Wi-Fi network was free.  However, the business model works because room rates were increased to recover costs and/or possibly generate revenue.  There are many indirect or less intrusive ways to monetize a Wi-Fi network than charge a fee through the CWP - many identified in the comments above.  As Dan wrote &quot;there&#39;s no such things as free Wi-Fi&quot; - is this just a question of managing the optics, so that Wi-Fi appears free and mantra&#39;s work?</p><p>Just my 00 cents [we did away with pennies so I had to round down]</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Rick comments on Free Wi-Fi Really Grinds My Gears</title><author>Rick</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:11:47 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/9/free-wi-fi-really-grinds-my-gears.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19919213</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>While I am onboard with the Mantra - &#39;Public Wi-Fi should be Free, Fast and Easy!&#39; I find this a very hard sell to most organizations who are designing networks around &quot;guest-access&quot;. Even the ones who design around enterprise first then layer guest on top, still want to benefit from it somehow. Obviously gone are the days where WiFi is a chargeable service (unless you are servicing a specific need like ballrooms, meetings rooms as indicated above) so organizations are looking at creative ways to gain some type of ROI while still providing a &quot;free&quot; service. Obviously, this is where analytics comes in - and the gathering of user information. While I totally agree the term &quot;free&quot; is too loosely tossed around (as nothing in life is ever really free) I can&#39;t blame organizations for wanting to get some info back from their end-users - and if they are using this information to improve service and features in their facility then everyone wins. </p><p>Just my two cents, for what it&#39;s worth.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Daniel comments on Free Wi-Fi Really Grinds My Gears</title><author>Daniel</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:13:36 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/9/free-wi-fi-really-grinds-my-gears.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19918877</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy,</p><p>Thanks for joining the discussion. It&#39;s great to get some perspective from the other side of coin. I like the idea of having varying degrees of &#39;free&#39; based on location and use case. Very cool concept.</p><p>Keith,</p><p>Sorry, I missed your last comment. I know we finished our debate on Twitter but I&#39;ll summarize my response here as well.</p><p>In short, I&#39;m not saying that I think everyone should be trying to make money off of public Wi-Fi. While I think your mantra is a nice romantic sentiment, I don&#39;t see that it fits into what I am seeing in the real world. While organizations don&#39;t need to try and profit from public Wi-Fi, I just can &#39;t see how it is viable for them not to try and recoup the cost and at least try and break even some how. </p><p>That being said, we live in a capitalist culture, so again, while it would be nice for all public Wi-Fi to be free I just don&#39;t see a reality where that will ever be the case. Whether it&#39;s money, or information, organizations will try to get something out of it. </p><p>Quite honestly, I believe that if organizations could find a way to profit from bathrooms they would. In fact, lot&#39;s already to recoup some costs by selling advertising space right above the urinals. In that case, you are paying to use the urinal with your attention to their advertising. </p><p>Interesting discussion but I guess we will have to just agree to disagree on this particular point.</p><p>Dan</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Keith Parsons comments on Free Wi-Fi Really Grinds My Gears</title><author>Keith Parsons</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:26:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/9/free-wi-fi-really-grinds-my-gears.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19917235</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>In my discussions with hospitality clients, they like to balk at the OPEX of ongoing Internet backhaul... but then don&#39;t have any problem paying for maids to service rooms, clean the pool area a couple times a day, sweep the parking lot, maintain elevators... all of which are also straight cost centers. Somehow they think Wi-Fi expenses should be &#39;special&#39;... come on folks, it&#39;s just another cost to build into your business model. Don&#39;t think of it as any form of profit center... thats when the trouble starts. </p><p>(see all the lost revenues from phone &#39;profits&#39; in the past...)</p><p>Ironically, some of the best hotel Wi-Fi I&#39;ve ever experienced has been at the cheaper hotels with truly &#39;free&#39; Wi-Fi... yet the more expensive the hotel, the worse the Wi-Fi experience. </p><p>It&#39;s all about expectations. End users (customers) expect Fast, Free, Easy Wi-Fi... and they should. It&#39;s the business managers who need to change from a profit center to a cost center mentality. It hasn&#39;t helped that a lot of Wi-Fi vendors try to sell to the business managers by telling them they can recover their costs in various nefarious ways.</p><p>Tell the business folks the truth, and you&#39;ll still get the sale. Real Estate properties NEED to deliver this service to maintain parity, especially in hospitality situations.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Andy comments on Free Wi-Fi Really Grinds My Gears</title><author>Andy</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:15:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/9/free-wi-fi-really-grinds-my-gears.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19917217</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Great post! </p><p>Coming from the hospitality industry, I&#39;m firmly entrenched in these discussions everyday. </p><p>Hotel guests are of the opinion that free wireless internet access is a must, a basic staple, similar to the common bathroom amenities provided. I&#39;m not saying I agree or disagree but that&#39;s just the perception and it&#39;s backed by industry research. Hotel owners/operators struggle with providing the service just due to the cost of implementing such a network properly. In the short term, if the project sponsor can get over the initial CAPEX hit, free wireless internet is a success. In the long term though, I feel it will never work. The continuous rise of OPEX for circuits alone is usually enough to stop free service dead in its tracks. From personal experience I&#39;ve also noticed that if it&#39;s free, the quality of the network is suffering. Whether that be because somebody decided to spring SOHO devices all over the place, or hotels running on gear that has been EoL for years. </p><p>All that said, our brand falls under the &quot;free&quot; banner. Lobbies are completely free, no captive portals, analytics, or time-constraints. Guest floors come w/ captive portals and analytics but at no obvious monetary charge. The only area we charge for internet is in meeting space and ballrooms and usually that&#39;s because we&#39;re offering a different level of service, HD Wi-Fi with dedicated bandwidth SLA&#39;s. I don&#39;t think we&#39;ve found the sweet spot just yet as we still battle with the issue everyday so it&#39;s refreshing to see outsider opinion. </p><p>Keep up the great work, it&#39;s nice to see a fellow GTA&#39;er puttting himself out there on the frontlines.</p><p>Andy</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Daniel comments on Free Wi-Fi Really Grinds My Gears</title><author>Daniel</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:08:40 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2013/4/9/free-wi-fi-really-grinds-my-gears.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1184767:13831911:comment/19916848</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Of course I read the terms &amp; conditions, Andrew. Doesn&#39;t everyone?</p><p>Yep, you got my sentiment and I&#39;m glad you agree. I just don&#39;t like the word free as much as I used to ;)</p><p>Also, I was actually thinking the same think about the Peter Griffin image but I got lazy. Poor form, I know...</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>